By Duncan Mills, Frank Nimphius | Article Rating: |
|
August 10, 2006 05:15 PM EDT | Reads: |
91,622 |
Listing 5 Indicating that a Web resource requires SSL
<user-data-constraint>
<transport-guarantee>CONFIDENTIAL</transport-guarantee>
</user-data-constraint>
Though J2EE Web resources can be configured to require HTTPS this way, the J2EE specification doesn't demand that Web containers respond by automatically switching protocols. Instead, J2EE containers usually return an HTTP error message to indicate a failed user request. Individual J2EE containers like Apache Tomcat provide native support for switching between the HTTP and HTTPS protocol. However, you ought to be aware that such solutions aren't portable to other J2EE containers.
Page Navigation in JavaServer Faces
So we've seen
how basic container-managed security is configured through the use of
logical application roles protecting a URL pattern. Now let's look at
how JSF manages page navigation and how the principles of
container-managed security can be applied.
Page navigation in JavaServer Faces is defined in the WEB-INF\faces-config.xml file, where the JSF NavigationHandler component uses it.
The application developer configures navigation in JSF either as a server-side forward or, if the <redirect/> element is included in the navigation case, as a browser redirect.
Listing 6 JSF navigation case issuing a redirect request for page navigation
<navigation-case>
<from-outcome>success</from-outcome>
<to-view-id>/Departments.jsp</to-view-id>
<redirect/>
</navigation-case>
Server-side forwards are the de facto default implementation of navigation cases in JSF, but such navigation harbors two side effects: first, the URL won't change, and so pages in the application aren't bookmarkable; and secondly, there's no new submission of a URL pattern for container-managed security to be applied to. As a consequence, if you've implemented container-managed security, you'll have to use <redirect/> explicitly on any navigation cases that have to trigger a security check across role boundaries.
It should be clear by now that authorizing pages and implementing a secure channel for communication isn't easy to achieve in JavaServer Faces. And using JAAS instead of container-managed security offers no better solution. The answer lies in a combined approach: a reusable custom security implementation specifically designed to work with JSF based on JAAS or container-managed J2EE security.
Where Does Security Belong in JavaServer Faces?
As
we've mentioned, JSF has no real security infrastructure built into it
and this leaves the developer to wonder where and how to implement
security. The examples that address user authentication in JSF (using
JAAS, for instance) don't cover the important task of page
authorization. (See Figure 1)
The authorization enforcer security pattern demands that authorization be handled in a central location. For many Web applications, this central location is a ServletFilter associated with the application front controller. In JSF, though, security is best implemented using the built-in extension points provided by the JavaServer Faces architecture.
The two candidate approaches for implementing security in JSF are:
- A custom ViewHandler that decorates the default ViewHandler and also adds security checks to the createView and restoreView methods
- A PhaseListener that adds security evaluation to the restoreView and invokeAction phases
Developing a JavaServer Faces PhaseListener for Security
JavaServer Faces executes in a rich request lifecycle composed of a
sequence of individual phase events: Restore View, Apply Request
Values, Process Validation, Update Model Values, Invoke Application,
and Render Response. PhaseListeners in JavaServer Faces are Java
classes configured in the faces-config.xml file and notified when a
specific phase event of interest occurs. (See Figure 2)
To execute custom logic before and after a specific event, custom application code is added to the beforePhase and afterPhase methods of a PhaseListener. Both methods accept an input argument of a PhaseEvent to provide information about the calling phase, for example, a phase ID. The third method developers have to implement is getPhaseId. The getPhaseId method is used to declare which phases the listener is actually interested in being notified about.
Listing 7 Custom PhaseListener listening to any event and implementing the JSf PhaseListener interface
public class J2EESecurityPhaseListener implements PhaseListener
{
public SecurityPhaseListener() { }
public void afterPhase(PhaseEvent phaseEvent) { }
public void beforePhase(PhaseEvent phaseEvent){ }
public PhaseId getPhaseId() {return PhaseId.ANY_PHASE;}
}
An application can have more than one PhaseListener configured. PhaseListeners are configured in the <lifecycle> element of the faces-config.xml configuration file.
Listing 8 PhaseListener configuration in faces-config.xml
<lifecycle>
<phase-listener>
com.groundside.jsf.J2EESecurityPhaseListener
</phase-listener>
</lifecycle>
Java IDEs like Oracle JDeveloper provide visual editors to simplify this configuration of the faces-config.xml file.
A J2EE security PhaseListener - J2EESecurityPhaseListener
The J2EESecurityPhaseListener is a custom PhaseListener that implements
page authorization for the JSF restoreView and invokeAction phases
using container-managed J2EE security roles. JSF doesn't let
PhaseListener register for multiple selected events. Either a
PhaseListener registers for one specific event or it registers for all
events. So the J2EESecurityPhaseListener listener is registered to
listen to any phase, but responds only to the RESTORE_VIEW and
INVOKE_APPLICATION phases.
Published August 10, 2006 Reads 91,622
Copyright © 2006 Ulitzer, Inc. — All Rights Reserved.
Syndicated stories and blog feeds, all rights reserved by the author.
More Stories By Duncan Mills
Duncan Mills is senior director of product management for Oracle's Application Development Tools - including the JDeveloper IDE, and the Oracle Application Development Framework. He has been in the IT industry for the past 19 years working with Oracle, Java, and a variety of more obscure programming languages and frameworks along the way. Duncan is the co-author of the Oracle Press book: Oracle JDeveloper 10g for Forms and PL/SQL Developers - a Guide to Web Development with Oracle ADF.
More Stories By Frank Nimphius
Frank Nimphius is a principal product manager for application development tools at Oracle Corporation. As a conference speaker, Frank represents the Oracle J2EE development team at J2EE conferences world wide, including various Oracle user groups and the Oracle Open World conference.
![]() |
y_alomoush 09/01/08 04:29:19 PM EDT | |||
Hi Duncan and Frank, Thanks for your great efforts. It is a job well done. In fact,I have installed the module and plugged it to my own application for evaluation purposes.However, I have found a scenario where a user can access into a unauthorized page, I don't know if I can call it as a bug or not. The scenario is as the following: 3-enter a correct username/password but not authorized to access that page. 3-system shall redirect you to error page using the sendError method. 4-call the same page again (using the same session). the system strangely forward you to the page that you are not authorized to access.(because the page is already cached as an authorized page) I think after the page is redirected to the error page the handleSecurity method must return, in this case, false instead of retuning true, this in order not to cache an unauthorized page. Thank yo once again. |
![]() |
keerthi 09/21/06 10:22:56 AM EDT | |||
Hi Duncan and Frank, This article is really an interesting one. I found it at a right moment of time as I was trying to implement Page level security in a Project based on JSF. |
![]() |
SYS-CON Italy News Desk 08/10/06 05:42:31 PM EDT | |||
Application security - the art of applications defending themselves - represents an important line of defence in an overall in-depth security strategy. Web applications that follow the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture can, and should, have security implemented on all three layers. Normally it's the controller component that handles page authorization in MVC, the view layer that hides controls and information based on user authorization, and the model that enforces the business rules and input validation. However, it's up to the developer, based on an individual security policy and the programming technology used, to decide where to put security. Using pluggable validator components in JavaServer Faces (JSF), for example, developers may decide to verify user input on the view layer as well as on the model layer. |
![]() |
AJAXWorld News Desk 08/10/06 05:26:41 PM EDT | |||
Application security - the art of applications defending themselves - represents an important line of defence in an overall in-depth security strategy. Web applications that follow the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture can, and should, have security implemented on all three layers. Normally it's the controller component that handles page authorization in MVC, the view layer that hides controls and information based on user authorization, and the model that enforces the business rules and input validation. However, it's up to the developer, based on an individual security policy and the programming technology used, to decide where to put security. Using pluggable validator components in JavaServer Faces (JSF), for example, developers may decide to verify user input on the view layer as well as on the model layer. |
![]() |
JDJ News Desk 07/26/06 05:18:34 PM EDT | |||
Application security - the art of applications defending themselves - represents an important line of defence in an overall in-depth security strategy. Web applications that follow the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture can, and should, have security implemented on all three layers. Normally it's the controller component that handles page authorization in MVC, the view layer that hides controls and information based on user authorization, and the model that enforces the business rules and input validation. However, it's up to the developer, based on an individual security policy and the programming technology used, to decide where to put security. Using pluggable validator components in JavaServer Faces (JSF), for example, developers may decide to verify user input on the view layer as well as on the model layer. |
![]() |
JDJ News Desk 07/26/06 04:40:02 PM EDT | |||
Application security - the art of applications defending themselves - represents an important line of defence in an overall in-depth security strategy. Web applications that follow the Model-View-Controller (MVC) architecture can, and should, have security implemented on all three layers. Normally it's the controller component that handles page authorization in MVC, the view layer that hides controls and information based on user authorization, and the model that enforces the business rules and input validation. However, it's up to the developer, based on an individual security policy and the programming technology used, to decide where to put security. Using pluggable validator components in JavaServer Faces (JSF), for example, developers may decide to verify user input on the view layer as well as on the model layer. |